Best 3 GDPR risk assessment examples

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), enacted by the European Union in May 2018, remains one of the most comprehensive data protection frameworks globally. It mandates organizations handling personal data of EU residents to ensure robust privacy practices, with hefty fines—up to €20 million or 4% of annual global turnover—for non-compliance. A key component of GDPR compliance is conducting risk assessments to identify, evaluate, and mitigate risks to personal data. These assessments are not one-size-fits-all; they vary depending on the organization’s size, industry, and data processing activities.

In this article, we’ll explore three exemplary GDPR risk assessment scenarios tailored to different contexts: a small e-commerce business, a healthcare provider, and a multinational tech company. Each example highlights practical steps, tools, and considerations to ensure GDPR compliance while addressing unique risks. Whether you’re a startup founder or a compliance officer, these examples will offer actionable insights to strengthen your data protection strategy.


Why GDPR Risk Assessments Matter

Before diving into the examples, let’s clarify why risk assessments are critical under GDPR. Article 32 of the regulation requires organizations to implement “appropriate technical and organizational measures” to secure personal data, taking into account the “risks presented by processing.” Article 35 further mandates a Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) for high-risk processing activities, such as large-scale data collection or profiling.

A GDPR risk assessment goes beyond checking boxes. It’s a proactive process to:

  • Identify potential threats to personal data (e.g., breaches, unauthorized access).
  • Assess the likelihood and severity of these risks.
  • Implement controls to mitigate them.
  • Demonstrate accountability to regulators and customers.

With this foundation, let’s explore our three examples.


Example 1: Small E-commerce Business – “ShopEasy”

Context

ShopEasy is a UK-based online retailer with 10 employees, selling handmade goods to customers across the EU. It collects names, addresses, payment details, and browsing preferences via its website. Annual revenue is £500,000, and it relies on third-party tools like a payment processor (Stripe) and a marketing platform (Mailchimp). ShopEasy’s leadership wants to ensure GDPR compliance as it scales.

Step 1: Data Mapping

The first step in ShopEasy’s risk assessment is understanding what data it processes. The team creates a data inventory:

  • Customer data: Names, emails, shipping addresses, payment details (processed by Stripe).
  • Website data: IP addresses, cookies (via Google Analytics), browsing history.
  • Marketing data: Email addresses and preferences (stored in Mailchimp).

This map reveals ShopEasy processes “personal data” under GDPR, triggering compliance obligations.

Step 2: Risk Identification

ShopEasy identifies potential risks:

  1. Data Breach: A hacker could exploit a website vulnerability, accessing customer data.
  2. Third-Party Risk: Stripe or Mailchimp could suffer a breach or misuse data.
  3. Consent Issues: The cookie pop-up lacks granular opt-in options, risking non-compliance with GDPR’s consent rules (Article 7).
  4. Data Retention: ShopEasy retains customer data indefinitely, increasing exposure if breached.

Step 3: Risk Evaluation

Using a simple likelihood-severity matrix (1-5 scale), ShopEasy assesses:

  • Data Breach: Likelihood (3), Severity (4) = Risk Score (12). A breach could leak sensitive data, leading to fines and reputational damage.
  • Third-Party Risk: Likelihood (2), Severity (3) = Risk Score (6). Vendors are GDPR-compliant, but dependency remains a concern.
  • Consent Issues: Likelihood (4), Severity (3) = Risk Score (12). Non-compliant consent could attract regulatory scrutiny.
  • Data Retention: Likelihood (2), Severity (3) = Risk Score (6). No immediate threat, but long-term risk accumulates.

Step 4: Mitigation Measures

ShopEasy implements controls:

  • Website Security: Installs an SSL certificate, updates plugins, and conducts quarterly vulnerability scans (£200/year).
  • Vendor Management: Reviews Stripe and Mailchimp’s GDPR compliance (e.g., Data Processing Agreements) and limits data shared.
  • Consent Management: Updates the cookie banner with opt-in/out toggles, costing £50 for a plugin.
  • Retention Policy: Sets a 2-year data retention limit, auto-deleting inactive accounts.

Step 5: Documentation and Review

ShopEasy documents the assessment in a spreadsheet, noting risks, scores, and actions. It assigns the marketing manager to review the process annually or after major changes (e.g., new vendors).

Outcome

ShopEasy’s lean approach suits its size and budget. By addressing high-risk areas (consent and breaches), it reduces exposure to fines and builds customer trust—all for under £300 in initial costs.


Example 2: Healthcare Provider – “MediCare Clinic”

Context

MediCare Clinic is a mid-sized private healthcare provider in Germany with 50 staff, serving 10,000 patients annually. It processes sensitive health data (e.g., medical records, diagnoses, insurance details) via an electronic health record (EHR) system and a patient portal. Given the “special category” status of health data under GDPR (Article 9), MediCare faces heightened compliance demands.

Step 1: Data Mapping

MediCare catalogs its data flows:

  • Patient Data: Names, addresses, health records, insurance IDs (stored in EHR).
  • Portal Data: Login credentials, appointment history (cloud-hosted).
  • Staff Data: Employee records, payroll (HR system).

This confirms MediCare processes large volumes of sensitive data, necessitating a DPIA.

Step 2: Risk Identification

Key risks include:

  1. Unauthorized Access: Weak EHR passwords could allow staff or hackers to view records.
  2. Data Loss: A ransomware attack could encrypt patient files.
  3. Patient Portal Breach: Misconfigured cloud settings might expose login data.
  4. Human Error: Staff emailing unencrypted records risks leaks.

Step 3: Risk Evaluation

MediCare uses a detailed risk matrix:

  • Unauthorized Access: Likelihood (3), Severity (5) = Risk Score (15). Health data leaks could harm patients and trigger €20M fines.
  • Data Loss: Likelihood (2), Severity (5) = Risk Score (10). Ransomware is less likely but devastating.
  • Portal Breach: Likelihood (3), Severity (4) = Risk Score (12). Cloud missteps are common in healthcare.
  • Human Error: Likelihood (4), Severity (3) = Risk Score (12). Frequent but less severe than breaches.

Step 4: Mitigation Measures

MediCare acts decisively:

  • Access Controls: Implements multi-factor authentication (MFA) for EHR and portal access (€5/user/month).
  • Backup and Recovery: Sets up encrypted, offsite backups with a 24-hour recovery plan (€1,000/year).
  • Cloud Security: Audits the patient portal, enabling encryption and restricting IP access (€2,000 one-time cost).
  • Training: Conducts quarterly GDPR training for staff, emphasizing email encryption (€500/session).

Step 5: DPIA and Oversight

MediCare completes a DPIA, detailing risks and mitigations, and submits it to its Data Protection Officer (DPO). The DPO schedules bi-annual reviews and stress-tests security measures.

Outcome

MediCare’s thorough assessment reflects the high stakes of health data. Investments (~€5,000/year) pale compared to potential fines or patient harm, making this a model for sensitive industries.


Example 3: Multinational Tech Company – “TechGlobal”

Context

TechGlobal is a US-based tech firm with EU operations, employing 5,000 people and serving 50 million users. It offers a cloud storage app collecting names, emails, files, and usage data. With cross-border data transfers and large-scale processing, TechGlobal faces complex GDPR challenges.

Step 1: Data Mapping

TechGlobal’s data flows are vast:

  • User Data: Account details, uploaded files (cloud servers in the US and EU).
  • Analytics Data: Behavioral tracking for product improvement.
  • Employee Data: HR records across 20 countries.

This triggers GDPR’s extraterritorial scope (Article 3) and transfer rules (Chapter V).

Step 2: Risk Identification

Risks include:

  1. Data Transfers: US-EU data flows risk violating GDPR post-Schrems II (invalidated Privacy Shield).
  2. Profiling Risks: Analytics could infringe user rights if not transparent (Article 22).
  3. Insider Threats: Employees accessing user files without need.
  4. Scalability: Rapid growth could outpace security measures.

Step 3: Risk Evaluation

TechGlobal uses a sophisticated risk model:

  • Data Transfers: Likelihood (4), Severity (5) = Risk Score (20). Regulatory action is probable without safeguards.
  • Profiling Risks: Likelihood (3), Severity (4) = Risk Score (12). Fines and user backlash are concerns.
  • Insider Threats: Likelihood (2), Severity (4) = Risk Score (8). Rare but impactful.
  • Scalability: Likelihood (3), Severity (3) = Risk Score (9). A growing but manageable risk.

Step 4: Mitigation Measures

TechGlobal deploys enterprise-grade solutions:

  • Transfer Safeguards: Adopts Standard Contractual Clauses (SCCs) and encrypts US-EU transfers ($50,000 implementation).
  • Transparency: Updates privacy notices and offers opt-outs for analytics (in-house legal team).
  • Access Governance: Deploys role-based access controls and audits employee activity ($100,000/year software).
  • Scalability Plan: Builds a compliance task force to monitor growth ($200,000/year).

Step 5: Continuous Monitoring

TechGlobal integrates risk assessments into its DevOps pipeline, using automated tools to flag vulnerabilities. It consults with EU regulators proactively to validate its approach.

Outcome

TechGlobal’s high-investment strategy (~$350,000/year) aligns with its scale and exposure. It mitigates blockbuster risks (e.g., transfers) while future-proofing compliance.


Comparing the Examples

Aspect ShopEasy MediCare TechGlobal
Size Small (10 staff) Medium (50 staff) Large (5,000 staff)
Data Sensitivity Moderate High (health data) High (mass user data)
Budget £300 €5,000/year $350,000/year
Key Risk Consent, breaches Breaches, human error Transfers, profiling
Tools Basic (plugins) Moderate (MFA, backups) Advanced (SCCs, audits)

These examples show that GDPR risk assessments scale with complexity. Small firms prioritize affordability, mid-sized ones balance cost and sensitivity, and large firms invest heavily in systemic solutions.


Best Practices for GDPR Risk Assessments

Drawing from these examples, here are universal tips:

  1. Start with Data Mapping: You can’t protect what you don’t understand.
  2. Prioritize High Risks: Focus on likelihood and severity to allocate resources wisely.
  3. Leverage Technology: From free plugins to enterprise software, tools streamline compliance.
  4. Document Everything: Regulators love paper trails—keep yours detailed.
  5. Review Regularly: Risks evolve; so should your assessment.

Conclusion

GDPR risk assessments are not a burden but an opportunity—to safeguard data, avoid fines, and build trust. ShopEasy’s lean approach, MediCare’s rigorous process, and TechGlobal’s strategic depth illustrate how any organization can tailor its efforts to its context. As data privacy remains a global priority in 2025, mastering these assessments is a competitive edge worth pursuing.